September 2, 2010

FHA Gives Home Buyers One Month Window to Lock in Low Insurance Premium

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 3:18 am

RISMEDIA, September 2, 2010—“The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) is giving homeowners and buyers until October 4, 2010 to lock in a low monthly insurance premium,” said Gibran Nicholas, chairman of the CMPS Institute, an organization that trains and certifies mortgage bankers and brokers. “After October 4, the monthly insurance premiums on FHA loans will increase by over 63%.”

What does this mean for home buyers?
A home buyer purchasing a $200,000 home using a $193,000 FHA mortgage before October 4 would pay an insurance premium of $88.46 per month. If the same home buyer waits until after October 4, the insurance premium would jump to $148.01.

“In this example, the home buyer would lose $59.55 per month, or $7,146 over a ten year timeframe,” Nicholas said. “Although the upfront mortgage insurance premium is going down after October 4, the real impact to the home buyer is actually a net increase in their out of pocket costs because the monthly premium is going up by 63%. Remember, sellers can pay the upfront premium or it can be financed into the loan amount, so home buyers rarely pay the upfront premium out of pocket. On the other hand, the increase in the monthly premiums will be paid right out of the home buyer’s pocket with their mortgage payment each month.”

Ironically, home buyers who plan to be in the mortgage for less than three years and decide to pay the upfront fee themselves (instead of having the seller pay it for them), may actually save money by waiting until after October 4 to apply for an FHA loan. “Home buyers with a short term time horizon may actually benefit from this change because the upfront premium will be reduced to 1% from 2.25%,” Nicholas said. This change will impact over 30% of the home buyers in today’s market who use FHA-insured financing. Home buyers considering an FHA loan should find and contact a CMPS professional in their area to discuss their options and what this means for their situation. Also, you can follow CMPS Institute on Twitter to stay updated on these and other mortgage and housing industry developments.

For more information, visit www.cmpsinstitute.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

Be sure to check out these headlines on RISMedia.com:
Housing Starts Rise 1.7 Percent in July
Federal Reserve Issues Final Rule on Loan Originator Compensation

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 31, 2010

Appraisal Institute’s New Guide to Home Buying Offers Uniquely Unbiased View

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 2:06 am

RISMEDIA, August 31, 2010—A home buying guide published recently by the Appraisal Institute teaches home buyers when to buy, how to find a real estate agent, how to choose the best home on the market and more—all from the uniquely unbiased perspective of a real estate appraiser. An Insider’s Guide to Home Buying by Mark R. Rattermann, MAI, SRA, notes that real estate appraisers are professionally trained to render an objective opinion of a home’s value. Because they are not paid by sales commissions, they have the unbiased perspective needed to help home buyers weigh their options carefully, make logical decisions and effectively navigate the sales negotiation and mortgage application processes.

Rattermann provides expert advice that will help protect consumers from abuse, explains biases that exist in the real estate industry and provides clues to possible problems, potentially protecting home buyers from significant financial losses.

In the book’s introduction, Rattermann writes: “The goal of this publication is to help home buyers ask the right questions. In many cases, people wish they had asked a few more questions before making significant decisions. Because the real estate industry is constantly changing, buying real estate requires you to stay current, research popular trends and attitudes and become an informed buyer.”

A real estate appraiser and agent in Indianapolis, Rattermann has worked in the real estate industry since 1979. He has written seven books about real estate and appraisals, some of which have been translated into Korean, Greek and other languages, and has lectured on a variety of real estate topics in 45 states and five countries. He has written 15 real estate training seminars and also writes on residential topics for The Appraisal Journal, the Appraisal Institute’s quarterly technical and scholarly publication. The Appraisal Institute is one of the nation’s largest professional organizations of real estate appraisers.

For more information, visit www.appraisalinstitute.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

For more real estate related headlines on RISMedia.com, be sure to see:
Reverse Mortgages Pros and Cons
‘Fundamental Change’ for Fannie and Freddie, Geithner Says

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 26, 2010

Some Homebuyers Are Holding Back, but Market offers Bright Spots Too

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 11:49 pm

RISMEDIA, August 27, 2010—(MCT)—Everywhere you look, July was not ideal for real estate—that’s one thing on which the economists and the statistics agree. Sales figures released recently for the first month in 19, not invigorated by government tax credits, offered a poor prognosis for the housing sector.

Nationally, sales of previously owned homes plunged 25.5% from July 2009—numbers the National Association of Realtors said had not been so low since 1999. Single-family home sales were at their lowest since May 1995, during the last housing bust.

Wall Street took the announcement by the Realtors’ association badly, and at the close of the trading day, the Dow was down 133.96 points.

“We knew that there would be payback for the government’s incentives but we didn’t think it would be so bad,” said Joel L. Naroff, of Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pa.

The end of the tax credit “hit with full force” in July, said economist Nigel Gault, of IHS Global Insight in Lexington, Mass. “The most worrying feature of the recent housing data is the absence of evidence of any underlying improvement in sales,” Gault said. “All of the action earlier this year appears to have been driven by the tax credit. Mortgage applications for purchase have been moving sideways since June, even as 30-year mortgage rates have headed into the low 4s.” A sustained housing upturn “will depend on an improvement in the jobs market, which at the moment is slowing down rather than gathering pace,” he said.

Realtors’ association economist Lawrence Yun acknowledged the downturn, but also offered perspective.

“Since May, after the April 30 deadline, contract signings have been notably lower,” he said, “and a pause period for home sales is likely to last through September.”

Still, Yun said, annual sales are expected to reach five million in 2010 because of the healthy activity in the first half of the year. “To place that in perspective, annual sales averaged 4.9 million in the past 20 years, and 4.4 million over the past 30 years.”

Thanks to the tax credit, home values have been stable for 18 months, Yun said.

In July, the nation’s median price rose 0.7% over July 2009, to $182,600. The median is the middle value; half the homes sold for more, half for less.

Yun insisted that record-low mortgage interest rates, now averaging 4.5% would encourage the wary to get back into the hunt.

In fact, rate-conscious buyers are just about the only ones in the market these days. They waited for rates to dip even further, more eager to save thousands over the life of their mortgages than to snag a one-time tax credit available only to qualified buyers.

Michelle Nnolum recently closed on her first home, a condo purchased for $195,500 with a $5,500 seller’s assist at Chanticleer in Cherry Hill, N.J. She signed the agreement of sale in July. “I never thought I could qualify to buy, but I kept hearing about these low rates,” said Nnolum, whose home-based business, ClassiFit, does custom alterations of gowns and evening wear.

She looked at four houses for sale with her agent, Giovanni Judenic of Long & Foster, before settling on a completely renovated two-bedroom, 2 1/2-bath condo that had been on the market for just three days.

Her rate: With a 20% down payment, 4.75%. But thanks to a “buydown” incentive from the mortgage broker, she will pay 3.75% for the first year, “which equals what I was paying for rent,” she said.

“I think values will go up,” said Nnolum. “With 20 percent down, I’ve started with a lot of equity already.”

Chris Bolli of Bristol, Pa., is equally interest-rate-conscious as he searches for a house.

A Navy veteran who sells prosthetic devices to area hospitals, first-time buyer Bolli has been looking for a three-bedroom, two-bath house with a garage for six months.

“Buying a house is a long-term investment, and finding the lowest fixed rate over 30 years is more important than $8,000 up front,” he said. “I wasn’t going to be pressured into buying something.”

One problem with his search has been that “sellers haven’t caught up yet with the realities of the market,” said Bolli, who considers $250,000 the middle of his price range.

“We looked at a house in an area where renovated houses were selling for $270,000, but the owner, who bought at the height of the market, wanted $380,000 for a house with 1950s fixtures,” Bolli said. “It wasn’t worth it.”

Anthony Sanders, professor of real estate finance at George Mason University in Virginia, said many sellers were “holding on to their overpriced housing, hoping that they won’t get damaged even further. There’s been a change in consumer psychology, and it’s difficult to reverse.”

Naroff, who recommends waiting until the fall before making judgments, said that “unless households and businesses have confidence about the future, they are not going to buy homes or invest, regardless of the interest rate.”

Housing’s double dip should not cause a double dip in the broader economy, said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.

“The recent weakness in housing won’t be severe or long enough to undermine the rest of the economy,” Zandi said. “It will be close, however, and it will be very uncomfortable through the remainder of the year. Nothing works all that well in the economy when housing is struggling.”

(c) 2010, The Philadelphia Inquirer.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Copyright© 2010 RISMedia, The Leader in Real Estate Information Systems and Real Estate News. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be republished without permission from RISMedia.

For more top stories on RISMedia.com, be sure to see:
Beware of Foundation Problems When Getting Your Home Ready for the Market
Government to Spend $3 Billion to Help Homeowners

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 22, 2010

Obama Administration Housing Scorecard Shows Continued Progress in Housing Market, but Challenges Remain

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 9:23 pm

RISMEDIA, August 23, 2010—The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury has released the August edition of the Obama Administration’s Housing Scorecard (www.hud.gov/scorecard), a comprehensive report on the nation’s housing market. In July, housing prices remained level after 30 straight months of decline, while some price predictions have improved. In addition, historic low interest rates continued to promote home affordability and refinancing options for the nation’s families. However, the market remains fragile with foreclosure starts showing a slight increase and serious delinquencies continuing to work through the pipeline.

“While there has been some stabilization in the housing market, it remains clear that we have more work ahead,” said HUD Assistant Secretary Raphael Bostic. “Through the Obama Administration’s efforts over the past 16 months, we have seen increased price stabilization and improved home affordability for prospective, qualified homebuyers. At the same time, we know that we must continue to provide support to underwater borrowers, unemployed homeowners, and to the nation’s hardest hit neighborhoods.”

The August Housing Scorecard features key data on the health of the housing market including:

• Stabilizing housing prices drive improving expectations in some regions. After 30 straight months of decline, home prices have leveled off in the past year; futures indices have shifted upward since January 2009 as signs of recovery continue, although overall housing outlook measures remain mixed.

• More than twice as many modification arrangements begun compared to foreclosure completions. More than 3.15 million modification arrangements were done from April 2009 through the end of June 2010. This includes more than 1.3 million trial Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) modifications started, over 472,000 Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loss mitigation and early delinquency interventions, and 1.4 million proprietary modifications under HOPE Now. The number of agreements offered continues to more than double foreclosure completions for the same period (1.24 million).

• More than 4.2 million families have benefited from housing counseling since April 2009. Working with a HUD-approved housing counselor can help borrowers manage debts apart from a mortgage – car payments, credit cards and personal loans, for example – and help them avoid falling into default.

• More than 37,000 homeowners received a HAMP permanent modification in July. While the pace of program entry has slowed due to upfront documentation requirements in place since June 1, this policy change streamlines the process to help more eligible homeowners convert to a permanent modification. Homeowners in permanent modifications are experiencing a median payment reduction of 36 percent, or more than $500 per month.

“HAMP, which represents just one, targeted piece of the Administration’s larger efforts on housing, has so far offered more than a million and half responsible homeowners the chance to modify their mortgages. This program has helped to stabilize a housing market that remains fragile and has redefined the modification standard for the industry – both of which are delivering real benefits to struggling homeowners in communities across the country,” said Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Stability Herb Allison. “Currently servicers are working through their pending modifications, and while Making Home Affordable works for a number of homeowners, many others are offered other means of avoiding foreclosure. As careful stewards of the scarce resources of the American taxpayer, we see this as prudent progress – and we will keep working to help the Americans hardest hit by this crisis.”

Data in the scorecard show that the recovery in the housing market continues to remain fragile, with some measures suggesting recovery will take place over time. For example, foreclosure starts went up slightly in July from the previous month, but remain well below July 2009 levels.

Foreclosure completions also inched upward as the volume of serious delinquencies continues to work through the pipeline.

Each month, the Housing Scorecard incorporates key housing market indicators and highlights the impact of the Administration’s unprecedented housing recovery efforts, including assistance to homeowners through the FHA and HAMP.

The Obama Administration’s complete Housing Scorecard available at: www.hud.gov/scorecard

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 21, 2010

What State Has Highest Closing Costs? Bankrate.com Releases 2010 Closing Costs Survey

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 8:45 pm

RISMEDIA, August 17, 2010—A new study released by Bankrate, Inc. reveals that the costs associated with buying a home may are on the rise. Bankrate’s 2010 Closing Costs Survey reveals that the average origination and title fees on a $200,000 mortgage this year totaled $3,741, up from $2,732 in 2009. The full results of the study can be seen here: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/mortgages/2010-closing-costs/.

In the study’s geographical breakdown, New York leads the nation at an average fee of $5,623, with Texas, Utah, San Francisco, and Los Angeles rounding out the top five. Arkansas is the least expensive area with an average fee of $3,007, replacing Nevada, now number 34, at the bottom of the list.

One of the reasons for such a dramatic rise in the average estimated closing costs across the nation has to do with new regulations implemented in January of this year. When providing a potential borrower a Good Faith Estimate (GFE) of costs, regulations now require lenders to provide a Title and Closing Fee estimate within 10 percent of what the final cost will be; in previous years, estimates could fall lower on the spectrum without penalty for the lender.

“The big rise in average closing costs may scare some homebuyers, but it’s important to keep things in perspective,” said Greg McBride, CFA, senior financial analyst for Bankrate.com. “Increased regulation on lenders’ GFEs means more accurate estimates and less expenses popping up for consumers on the back end.”

For this study, Bankrate surveyed one area in 49 states, two areas in California (Los Angeles and San Francisco) and the District of Columbia. Researchers picked a ZIP code in some of the largest cities in each state and requested information on the closing costs for at $200,000 loan. They requested fees on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage for a borrower with a 20 percent down payment and good credit to buy a single-family house. Bankrate’s survey includes lenders’ origination fees and title and settlement fees, and not taxes or prepaid items.

To see the full results visit http://www.bankrate.com/finance/mortgages/2010-closing-costs/ or for more information, visit Bankrate.com.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 20, 2010

‘Fundamental Change’ for Fannie and Freddie, Geithner Says

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 8:10 pm

RISMEDIA, August, 18, 2010—(MCT)—With sweeping financial reform legislation enacted, the White House and Congress now must focus on fixing the mess created by the failed housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It’s a complex challenge with high stakes for taxpayers and the struggling real estate market.

On Tuesday, key administration officials conferred with about 200 industry executives, affordable housing advocates and other experts about the role the government should play in the nation’s housing finance system. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner asserted that federal involvement still was needed, but he promised “fundamental change.”

“It is not tenable to leave in place the system we have today,” he said, adding that Fannie and Freddie will change dramatically when they emerge from government control.

Pressure is growing to remake or replace the mortgage leviathans, which were seized by the government in September 2008 after huge losses from subprime mortgages put them on the brink of bankruptcy. The bailout has cost U.S taxpayers nearly $150 billion. But lawmakers must tread carefully to keep from further damaging a housing market that Fannie and Freddie almost solely are supporting. The two companies, along with the Federal Housing Administration, collectively guarantee more than 90 percent of all new U.S. home loans.

“Nobody wants to mess up the mortgage market,” said Douglas Elliott, an economics fellow at the Brookings Institution think tank. “And any transition with Fannie and Freddie is going to be fraught with some risk.”

Tuesday’s event came as the second anniversary of the government seizure of the firms approached, a bailout that left taxpayers as 80 percent owners. The administration faces a January deadline, added by lawmakers to the financial reform legislation, to make recommendations to end the expensive federal conservatorship of the firms.

Congress plans to ratchet up its involvement as well, with House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., saying his committee will begin hearings when members return next month.

That’s not fast enough for many Republicans, signaling another bitter partisan reform fight. They have been pushing the administration for more than a year to address the mounting losses at Fannie and Freddie by getting the government out of the housing finance business.

“It is past time to rid the American taxpayer of the liabilities of these financial institutions once and for all,” Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., said Tuesday as he blasted the Obama administration for continuing the bailouts of Fannie and Freddie begun under President George W. Bush.

But the Obama administration has been moving slowly for fear of further harming the housing market. There was fresh evidence of problems Tuesday as Southern California home sales plunged 21.4 percent in July compared with a year earlier, according to research firm MDA DataQuick of San Diego.

“It’s much more important to get this issue right than to do it fast,” said Michael Berman, chairman-elect of the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Shaun Donovan, the secretary of Housing and Urban Development, said the stakes were high not just for the financial system but also for average Americans because of the major investment in their homes.

Donovan said the federal government’s involvement in the housing market needed to be reduced. And Geithner said there was a strong case for a “carefully designed” government mortgage guarantee in the future, a point echoed by panelists at the conference.

There also appeared to be consensus among the participants that any government guarantee needed to be explicit, not murky and implicit like the guarantee that stood behind Fannie and Freddie as private, government-sponsored enterprises before they were seized.

William Gross, managing director of bond fund giant Pimco, said government guarantees were crucial to the housing market, helping keep mortgage rates low.

But there still is major debate about how to structure such a guarantee and what size mortgages it should cover.

“The challenge is to make sure that any government guarantee is priced to cover the risk of losses, and structured to minimize taxpayer exposure,” Geithner said.

Fannie and Freddie were created by Congress and later turned into private, government-sponsored enterprises mandated to expand homeownership with requirements to purchase a set amount of loans made to low- and moderate-income borrowers.

Fannie and Freddie combined hold the credit risk on about $5 trillion in mortgages, and losses from loans made during the housing boom have continued to mount. The Treasury Department has pledged it will cover an unlimited amount of losses through 2012. As of June 30, the department had pumped $144.9 billion into the two companies.

Federal officials have stressed that the losses came from loans purchased before the government seizure and said standards at Fannie and Freddie have tightened significantly since then. And as the housing market has stabilized, the losses at Fannie and Freddie have lessened. Fannie lost $1.2 billion in the second quarter, down from $11.5 billion in the first quarter. Freddie lost $4.7 billion in the second quarter, down from $6.7 billion in the first quarter.

Still, the losses meant the two firms would need an additional $3.3 billion from the Treasury Department, bringing their bailout cost to $148.2 billion.

(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 19, 2010

New Rules Limit Too-Low Estimates of Closing Costs

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 7:33 pm

RISMEDIA, August 20, 2010—(MCT)—Facing new penalties if they lowball estimates of upfront mortgage costs, lenders and brokers appear to be coming clean about how much borrowers will pay. As a result, the so-called good-faith estimates that mortgage providers must give to prospective customers show closing costs soaring 36 percent this year, interest-rate tracker Bankrate.com said in a report this week.

The main reason for the increase, according to Bankrate: Lenders are giving more accurate estimates because they now must pay to cover the difference if they underestimate the costs, according to Bankrate.

In other words, the good-faith estimates are, well, being made in better faith.

Before Jan. 1, there was no penalty for giving bad estimates, so lenders battling for mortgage business had more of an incentive to give lowball quotes.

Lenders told Bankrate that actual closing costs rose modestly this year, in part because regulators and loan buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are requiring mortgage firms to do far more fact-checking than during the boom years.

Consumer advocates say the report demonstrates how lenders took advantage of lax regulation during the housing boom by often keeping borrowers in the dark about costs until they were faced with nasty surprises when their loans closed.

“Why is transparency such a challenge for them?” said Alan Fisher, executive director of the California Reinvestment Coalition.

According to Bankrate’s survey, which obtained online good-faith estimates for loans of $200,000, estimates of closing costs charged directly by lenders are up 23 percent from a year ago. Estimated charges for third parties such as appraisers and title insurers soared 47 percent.

California was among the highest-priced states in the survey.

The only states with higher fees than California were New York, with costs averaging $5,623, followed by Texas at $4,708 and Utah at $4,605.

Arkansas was the least expensive state, with costs averaging $3,007.

The most expensive component of closing costs was a title search and insurance to protect the lender from the possibility that title is not held free and clear.

These title costs averaged just $1,011 in Arkansas and $1,141 in North Carolina but set Los Angeles borrowers back an average of $2,391 and San Franciscans an average $3,181, Bankrate said.

The increase in estimates of closing costs stems from regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 18, 2010

Harvard Researcher Shares Insights on Housing Comeback

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 7:01 pm

RISMEDIA, August 19, 2010—(MCT)—As director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard, Nicolas Retsinas has had a front-row seat for the real estate market’s dramatic boom and bust. After 12 years at the center, Retsinas left the director’s job to teach housing finance at Harvard Business School. He spoke recently with New Jersey’s The Record about why buyers got mortgages they couldn’t afford, and why real estate matters so much.

Were you surprised by the magnitude of the housing bust and how long it has lasted?
Nicolas Retsinas:
Yes, by the severity of the housing bust but even more so, how credit just seized up.

When do you see any kind of loosening-up of the credit markets?
NR:
I would suspect we’re likely to see the same dominance of the government at least through the balance of this year. One of the big issues facing public policymakers is what to do with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If we want to attract private capital, not only from this country but also global capital, some part of that credit risk has to be borne by the government.

One of the biggest factors in the bust was that credit standards got too easy. Buyers who weren’t qualified got mortgages. Do you have any ideas about why this happened?
NR:
In part, people were granted mortgages not on their ability to repay the mortgage, because it was clear that wasn’t going to happen. But there was an expectation that even if they couldn’t pay, the future increase in the value of the property would end up being the collateral for that loan. For a long time, that was a formula that worked. But we reached a point where even with these exotic—what turned out to be toxic—mortgage terms, they just weren’t affordable.

What has been the biggest human cost of the housing bust?
NR:
The biggest human cost is the millions of people who have lost their homes. One can look back coldly and say, “Well, maybe a lot of them shouldn’t have bought a home in the first place.” But a lot of people lost their homes the old-fashioned way: they lost their jobs.

Who has benefited from the bust?
NR:
Beside the investors who played with different sorts of financial products, I think the key winners probably have been first-time home buyers, who have maybe longed to buy a house but could not afford to. Now we’ve essentially transferred wealth from existing homeowners to new homeowners.

Some observers have been disappointed by the number of homeowners helped by the federal loan modification program.
NR:
In defense of the government, when they designed this program 18 months ago, they based it on a premise that the principal problem in the housing market was egregious mortgage terms. And if those mortgage terms could be reset and recalibrated to more typical mortgage terms and could be afforded, through subsidy or whatever means, by the borrower, that would stem the hemorrhage of the defaulted loans and foreclosures.

As we moved into 2009, the problem was less about the subprime loans and more the traditional reason why people have problems making ends meet—which is that they lost their jobs. If you modify the loan so that your monthly payments are only 31% of your income, and your income is zero, that’s probably not going to work. The problem outran the solution.

Will home-price appreciation return anytime soon?
NR:
The next couple of months will be an interesting test because we’ve had the withdrawal of the home buyer tax credit. I think we’re likely to have a sort of trawl-along-the-bottom type of recovery, a little bit lumpy for a year or so.

Congress is looking at new financial regulations. What effect are these likely to have on mortgages?
NR:
I think it’ll make it more difficult to go back to the Wild, Wild West. There will be a new consumer financial agency, and I think that will be more likely to look at some of these (mortgage) products. I think that’s going to be critical. RE

(c) 2010, North Jersey Media Group Inc.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 17, 2010

Housing Starts Rise 1.7 Percent in July

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 6:20 pm

RISMEDIA, August 18, 2010—Nationwide housing starts inched up 1.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 546,000 units in July from a downwardly revised figure in the previous month, according to U.S. Commerce Department figures released today. The gain occurred entirely on the multifamily side, with single-family housing production falling 4.2 percent to 432,000 units.

“Builders are very reluctant to build more homes in view of the current state of the economy and weak buyer demand,” noted Bob Jones, chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and a home builder from Bloomfield Hills, Mich.

“Right now the housing market is essentially in a holding pattern,” acknowledged NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “As our latest member surveys have indicated, builders are seeing greater hesitancy among potential home buyers who are uncertain about what’s in store for the economy and jobs going forward. That said, favorable home buying conditions including historically low mortgage rates and low house prices should help spur additional demand as the job market gradually improves later this year.”

The entire 1.7 percent gain in housing production this July was due to a 32.6 percent jump on the more volatile multifamily side, which brought that sector back closer to trend at a 114,000-unit rate following a major dip in the previous month. Meanwhile, single-family housing production declined 4.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 432,000 units, its lowest mark since May of 2009.

Two regions registered improved starts activity in July, with the Northeast and Midwest each posting double-digit gains, of 30.5 percent and 10.7 percent, respectively. The South, which is the country’s largest housing market, posted a 6.3 percent decline in starts this July, while the West posted no change in starts activity.

Permit issuance, which can be an indicator of future building activity, declined 3.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 565,000 units in July. Single-family permits fell 1.2 percent to 416,000 units, while multifamily permits fell 8 percent to 149,000 units. Regionally, permits fell nearly 26 percent in the Northeast, 1.1 percent in the Midwest, and 4.9 percent in the West, but gained 3.9 percent in the South in July.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

August 16, 2010

The Year of the Short Sale: 7 Tips to Finding Your New Home at Discount

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 5:46 pm

RISMEDIA, August 17, 2010—Real estate professionals nationwide are calling 2010 “the year of the short sale,” where homeowners who owe more on their properties than what they are worth sell at deeply discounted prices—with the blessing of their lender.

Here is how to go about successfully buying a short sale:

1. Search for short sale properties
Most short sales are listed by real estate agents. You will find these listings on local websites and in MLS feeds. Some lenders have complained about advertising that identifies the home as a short sale, because the lenders feel it puts them at a disadvantage when it comes to home pricing. This is accurate, as buyers generally offer less when the property is advertised as a short sale.

Read the listing carefully. Agents slip in words that identify the listing as a short sale. Look for the following terms:

• Subject to bank approval
• Pre-foreclosure
• Notice of Default
• Give the bank time to respond
• Preapproved by bank
• Headed for auction

2. Select a real estate professional
Professionals with short sale experience can help you navigate the short sales process in your local market. The buying process is often far more complex—and far longer than typical sales–so a trained ally on your side can make your experience successful.

3. Investigate the mortgage and liens on the property
Here’s where a good short sale real estate agent is worth his or her weight in gold. Uncover how much the mortgage is worth. Find out how much the current owners paid and when. Find out how many liens are on the property. Find out which lender is the primary lien holder. Research comparable sales in the area.

4. Have a home inspection
Short sales are typically sold “as is,” with no contingencies allowed. That short sale is no bargain if you discover—after the closing—that it requires major, unexpected repairs. A thorough home inspection will provide a clear view of the home’s condition, allowing you to make educated decisions on whether or not to purchase.

5. Write a complete offer
Remember, the lender—not the owner selling the property—is calling the shots and decides whether your offer will be accepted, rejected or countered. Helping the lender, whose agents may be overloaded with a glut of short sales, fully understand the financial picture will support your bid. Include the following materials with any short sale offer:

• Cover letter
• Signed owner/borrower short sale purchase agreement
• Seller hardship letter
• Seller payroll stubs
• Two years of seller tax returns
• Market comparables
• HUD-1 closing net sheet
• Repair cost estimate
• Pictures of property

6. Negotiate
Like any real estate transaction, successful negotiation is required to strike a deal. If the lender rejects or counters your written offer, you’ll have to negotiate with the lender by making a higher offer. Be prepared to offer more money to close the deal, or to walk away if it doesn’t make financial sense.

7. Be Patient
Short sales, which have increased in volume and frequency, are overloading some lenders. Be aware that processing and decision-making times for some lenders can be quite long—up to a year or more. Decide if you have flexibility in your timing, and if so, know that you may be waiting for awhile.

Dan Steward is president of Pillar To Post Home Inspection.

For more information, visit www.pillartopost.com.

RISMedia welcomes your comments and questions. Email realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101