March 9, 2010

Pending Home Sales Down; Severe Weather Impacting Market

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 8:44 pm

RISMEDIA, March 10, 2010—Pending home sales are down and additional declines are expected from abnormal weather conditions, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

The Pending Home Sales Index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in January 2010, fell 7.6% to 90.4 from an upwardly revised 97.8 in December, but remains 12.3% higher than January 2009 when it was 80.5.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said weather is likely to impact housing data. “January pending sales, though still higher than one year ago, remain much lower than expected given that a large number of potential buyers are eligible for the expanded home buyer tax credit. Moreover, the abnormally severe and prolonged winter weather, which affected large regions of the U.S., hampered shopping activity in February,” he said.

As such, abnormal swings are expected in housing data. “We will see weak near-term sales followed by a likely surge of existing-home sales in April, May and June,” Yun said. “The real question is what happens in the second half of the year. If there is sufficient job creation, housing can become self-sustaining with stable to modestly rising home prices because inventory has been trending downward.”

The PHSI in the Northeast fell 8.7% to 71.3 in January but is 20.5% higher than January 2009. In the Midwest the index dropped 8.9% to 81.2 but is 11.8% above a year ago. Pending home sales in the South slipped 2.1% to an index of 98.1, but the index is 18.0% higher than January 2009. In the West the index dropped 13.2% to 102.9 but is 1.4% above a year ago.

For more information, visit www.realtor.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

For more top headlines on RISMedia.com, don’t miss:
Home Buyers Rush to Take Advantage of Tax Credit Before It’s Gone
Homeowners Rent Out Rooms to Stave off Foreclosure

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 8, 2010

Home Sales Dip in January 2010

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 8:17 pm

RISMEDIA, March 8, 2010—(MCT)—In another sign that the foundation of the U.S. housing recovery might be shaky, the number of homes placed under sales contract fell 7.6% in January 2010, according to a national index.

The National Association of Realtors recently said that its pending home sales index, a forward-looking indicator based on contracts signed in January, fell to 90.4 from an upwardly revised 97.8 in December. That remains 12.3% higher than January 2009, when it was 80.5. The group blamed the weather for the month-over-month decline.

“January pending sales, though still higher than one year ago, remain much lower than expected given that a large number of potential buyers are eligible for the expanded home buyer tax credit,” Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the Realtors group, said in a statement. “Moreover, the abnormally severe and prolonged winter weather, which affected large regions of the U.S., hampered shopping activity in February.”

The January results were the lowest since April. The biggest month-over-month drop came in the West, where the index declined 13.2%. The index fell 8.9% in the Midwest, 8.7% in the Northeast and 2.1% in the South.

(c) 2010, Los Angeles Times.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 7, 2010

Buyers Shift More Firmly into Driver’s Seat during January 2010

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 7:38 pm

RISMEDIA, March 8, 2010—For the second month in a row, home buyers across much of the country negotiated bigger discounts off the last listing price of homes than they had the prior month, according to new data from real estate website Zillow.com.

Buyers in the United States paid a final sale price of 2.8%, or $5,823, less than the last listing price during January, up from a median discount of 2.7% in December and 2.6% in November. December marked the first time in 11 months that buyers gained back negotiating power; for much of 2009, buyer discounts shrank as real estate markets across the country improved. One year ago, in January 2009, buyers negotiated a median 4.5%, or $10,178 off the last listing price of homes.

The biggest discounts continued to be found in Florida, although buyers in several New York City-area metros also found relatively large discounts during January. To see a list of where the largest discounts were found, click here.

However, sellers continued to do well in several markets, with most buyers in places like El Centro and Stockton, Calif., paying more than the last listing price of homes sold in January. To see the complete list, click here.

Fewer for-sale homes experienced price reductions in January 2010 than in December, with nearly one in five (19.8%) of homes for sale on Zillow experiencing at least one price cut as of the end of January.

For more real estate data, visit Zillow.com.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

Don’t miss these headlines on RISMedia.com:
Create Your 2010 Success Blueprint
Volunteers Encourage Neighbors to Seek Trial Loan Modifications

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 6, 2010

New GFE and HUD-1 Settlement Statement to Create More Transparent Lending Process

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 7:00 pm

RISMEDIA, March 6, 2010—Not only did we turn over a new year on January 1, 2010, but the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ushered in monumental and mandatory changes to the Good Faith Estimate (GFE) and HUD-1 settlement statement (HUD-1).

The intent behind these changes is to make the lending process more transparent by providing settlement and loan information in a way that will allow borrowers to more easily shop loans and compare charges. To that end, the format of both the GFE and HUD-1 has been substantially altered. And while the goal is transparency for the borrower, most in our industry are still struggling to find clarity as to how to prepare these new forms.

Previously a one page document, the new GFE is now three pages in length.

The first page contains an important dates section as well as a summary of the borrower’s loan terms and the total settlement charges. The second page contains the breakdown of these charges into specific blocks depending on the particular settlement service and service provider. The last page explains that these blocks can fall into one of three different “tolerance buckets” meaning that at the time of closing, certain fees may fluctuate either by 10% in aggregate, without limitation, or not at all.

When preparing the new GFE, the loan originator must be sure to calculate the settlement charges correctly and properly disclose the charges in the appropriate GFE block. A miscalculation could be costly and result in the loan originator having to pay to cure a tolerance violation. For this reason, communication between the loan originator and settlement agent is more important than ever to ensure that the fees for all parties are accurate.

Once a new GFE has been issued, the settlement agent is required to use the new HUD-1. Page two of the HUD-1 mimics much of the format of the second page of the GFE. The third page shows whether the actual HUD-1 charges fall within the allowable tolerance limits as compared to the figures shown on the GFE. If a violation has occurred, the loan originator has 30 days from settlement to cure the violation. Page three of the HUD-1 also contains the loan summary similar to page one of the GFE. Again, the idea is that the two documents work in conjunction with each other in a way that makes comparison easy for the borrower.

For now, the best way to ensure that your company is complying with these new rules is to familiarize yourself with the new GFE and HUD-1 settlement statement forms. Both can be found on the website of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development: www.hud.gov.

About the Author
Alyce Ritchie is a Partner and Practice Manager at Morris|Hardwick|Schneider.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 5, 2010

NAHB Reminds Home Buyers: Tax Credit Expiring Soon

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 6:28 pm

RISMEDIA, March 5, 2010—The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) wants potential home buyers to be aware that they still have the opportunity to take advantage of the $8,000 first-time home buyer or $6,500 repeat buyer tax credits, as long as they act quickly—the credits expire on April 30, 2010.

“It’s not too late to take advantage of the home buyer tax credit,” said NAHB Chairman Bob Jones, a builder and developer in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. “There are plenty of existing homes on the market, and even though the move-in ready newly constructed homes inventory has dwindled, builders may still be able finish a home in time.”

The IRS provides an additional two months beyond the deadline to close the deal. Buyers who sign a sales contract by the April 30 deadline are still eligible if they close the sale of the home by June 30, 2010.

More people than ever before are eligible for a home buyer tax credit, NAHB estimates that close to 70% of all potential buyers should qualify for some form of a credit.

First-time buyers don’t have to be buying their first home ever; they are defined by the IRS as those who have not owned a principal residence in the past three years. Repeat buyers may be eligible for a new $6,500 credit, as long as they have owned and lived in their current home at least five consecutive out of the past eight years.

The current credits also increase the income limits, enabling single taxpayers with incomes up to $125,000 and married couples earning up to $225,000 to potentially qualify for a full credit.

NAHB’s website at www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com, which has received more than 6.5 million visitors since the site launched, provides basic information about the credits, detailed question and answer sections, and links to additional home-buying resources for consumers.

“If you’ve been considering buying a home for any reason, the home buyer tax credit, in addition to historically low interest rates and competitive home prices, make it an ideal time to buy,” said Jones.

For more information, visit www.nahb.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 4, 2010

Poll Shows Strong Support for Government Housing Initiatives

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 5:53 pm

RISMEDIA, March 5, 2010—Americans remain strongly committed to federal support for home buyers, according to a recent survey of U.S. households.

Roughly 68% of those polled said the government should continue to support housing, and 65% believe the government should be doing more to keep families from losing their homes to foreclosure.

The poll included both home owners and renters and was conducted for the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) by RT Strategies, a non-partisan public opinion polling firm based in Washington, D.C. RT Strategies interviewed a representative sample of 1,000 adults nationwide by telephone using live interviewers on January 29-31, 2010. The sample included 170 interviews with respondents from cell-phone-only households.

Among those polled, some key groups said the government should continue to play a vital role in maintaining a healthy housing market. For example, 78% of all potential home buyers, including 81% of renters intending to buy a home in the near future, said the government should continue to support housing.

Roughly 65% of home owners said the government also needs to do more to keep families from losing their homes. Support for more foreclosure protection was not confined merely to current home owners. Among renters, 84% said the government needs to do more to helped strapped borrowers. This issue is particularly important to women, with 71% supporting greater foreclosure protection, compared to 58% of men.

Keeping families in their homes is also particularly important to first-time home buyers, as 78% of young adults under age 30 support greater foreclosure protection. And 69% of adults who are 30 to 44, the prime age range for move-up buyers, said they support more foreclosure protection.

Overall, roughly two-in-three respondents said they own their home. Among renters, about two-in-three intend to buy a home in the near future. In addition, 15% of current home owners intend to buy a home in the near future.

The poll asked respondents for their views regarding the Worker, Homeownership and Business Assistance Act of 2009 that extended a tax credit of up to $8,000 for qualified first-time home buyers purchasing a principal residence. The legislation, which was signed into law by President Obama in November 2009, also authorized a tax credit of up to $6,500 for qualified repeat home buyers. Overall, 8% of those surveyed said they intend to take advantage of this credit, while another 24% who might have been interested in using the tax credit said they cannot afford to purchase a home at this time. Of the 33% of respondents who said they are planning to buy a home (both renters and current home owners), roughly 17% said they intend to use the tax credit.

Financial concerns continue to be the greatest barrier to growth in the housing market. Among renters nationwide who aspire to own their own home, 39% simply don’t have the money to buy a home at this time, and another 20% said the primary obstacle is that they feel they cannot qualify for a loan. Larger economic issues also play a role, as 18% of those surveyed said that job security is the greatest obstacle they face in trying to buy a home.

Weakness in the housing market itself may be blocking some home owners who would like to buy a new home, as 29% of current home owners said their greatest obstacle to purchasing another home is their inability to sell their current home. Beyond that, among current homeowners who aspire to buy a new home, 7% feel trapped by a mortgage that exceeds the value of their current home, 14% fear that the value of a new home might fall after they make the investment, and 13% say home prices are too high to allow them to buy a new home at this time.

Even amid a housing market downturn, 40% of respondents said their home is their most valuable investment, twice the number who cite any other single investment–401k accounts, savings accounts and CDs, stocks and bonds, or mutual funds–as their leading family investment.

For more information, visit www.nahb.org.

For more real estate related headlines on RISMedia.com, don’t miss:
Number of ‘For Sale’ Homes Increased 2.9 Percent in January 2010 According to ZipRealty Housing Report
FTC Proposes Rule That Would Bar Mortgage Relief Companies from Charging Up-Front Fees

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

March 3, 2010

Existing-Home Sales Down in January 2010 but Higher Than Year Ago

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 5:11 pm

RISMEDIA, March 4, 2010—Existing-home sales fell in January 2010 but are above year-ago levels, according to the National Association of Realtors. Existing-home sales- including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops- dropped 7.2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.05 million units in January from a revised 5.44 million in December, but remain 11.5% above the 4.53 million-unit level in January 2009.

Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said there is still some delay between shopping and closing that affected current sales. “Most of the completed deals in January were based on contracts in November and December. People who got into the market after the home buyer tax credit was extended in November have only recently started to offer contracts, so it will take a couple months to close those sales,” he said. “Still, the latest monthly sales decline is not encouraging, and raises concern about the strength of a recovery.”

Total housing inventory at the end of January fell 0.5% to 3.27 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 7.8-month supply at the current sales pace, up from a 7.2-month supply in December. Raw unsold inventory is 9.6% below a year ago, and is at the lowest level since March 2006.

“Activity should be picking up strongly in late spring as buyers take advantage of the tax credit, which is critical to absorb distressed properties reaching the market and to continually chip away at inventory,” Yun said. “With a downtrend in the number of homes on the market, especially in the lower price ranges, values are beginning to firm but with great variance around the country.”

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $164,700 in January, unchanged from a year earlier. Distressed homes, which accounted for 38% of sales last month, continue to downwardly distort the median price because they typically are discounted in comparison with traditional homes in the same area.

A parallel NAR practitioner survey shows first-time buyers purchased 40% of homes in January, down from 43% in December. Investors accounted for 17% of transactions in January, up from 15% in December; the remaining sales were to repeat buyers. The survey also shows that buyer traffic increased 9.4% in January.

NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz., said buying a home in the current environment has become more challenging. “First-time buyers and others who need a mortgage are increasingly losing out to all-cash investors for the best bargains in many areas, particularly for foreclosed homes where cash is king,” she said. “Inventory conditions vary by price range, and of course there are major differences depending on location. Realtors are the best buyer resource for strategies on winning bids in increasingly competitive markets,” Golder said. “The bidding for more desirable homes will only accelerate between now and the April 30 contract deadline to qualify for a tax credit of up to $8,000.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage edged up to 5.03% in January from 4.93% in December; the rate was 5.05% in January 2009.

Single-family home sales fell 6.9% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.43 million in January from a level of 4.76 million in December, but are 8.6% above the 4.08 million pace in January 2009. The median existing single-family home price was $163,600 in January, down 0.4% from a year ago.

Existing condominium and co-op sales dropped 8.1% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 620,000 in January from 675,000 in December, but are 38.1% above the 449,000-unit level a year ago. The median existing condo price was $172,400 in January, which is 1.4 % higher than January 2009.

Northeast
Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast fell 10.9% to an annual pace of 820,000 in January but are 22.4% above a year ago. The median price in the Northeast was $245,300, a gain of 8.8% from January 2009.

Midwest
Existing-home sales in the Midwest declined 6.9% in January to a level of 1.08 million but are 8.0% higher than January 2009. The median price in the Midwest was $130,300, which is 1.0% below a year ago.

South
In the South, existing-home sales dropped 7.4% to an annual pace of 1.87 million in January but are 12.0% above a year ago. The median price in the South was $140,200, down 2.0% from January 2009.

West
Existing-home sales in the West declined 5.2% to an annual rate of 1.28 million in January but are 7.6% higher than January 2009. The median price in the West was $203,400, down 5.8% from a year ago.

For more information, visit www.realtor.org.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

For more top headlines on RISMedia.com, be sure to see:

Foreclosures Take Heavy Toll on Hearts and Minds
Even in Tough Times, 77 Percent of Americans View Homeownership as a Part of Their Own Personal American Dream

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

February 27, 2010

Crawling Out of the Housing Hole: Realtors Agree Housing Market Is Stabilizing, but Still Troubled

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 2:46 pm

RISMEDIA, February 27, 2010—(MCT)—The good news is, it’s a buyers’ market. The bad news is, it’s a buyers’ market. From the rubble of the housing collapse has arisen a seemingly endless supply of houses from which to choose. Good news if you’re buyer. Challenging news if you’re a seller. Mixed news if you’re a Realtor.

The extension of the home buyers’ credit is expected to spur an increase in sales during the first quarter of 2010, normally the slowest quarter of the year, said Gary Walter, executive vice president of the Southwestern Michigan Association of Realtors Inc.

With competitive prices, low interest rates and a huge tax credit on their side, buyers are jumping off the fence. And if you’ve got a house to sell, there are things you can do to make sure they land on your side, Realtors say.

“If you’re looking around your house and you ask yourself: ‘Should I paint this room?’ you probably should,” said Ryan Arnt, associate president of Meredith and Kamp Realtors of Stevensville.

Another piece of advice from area Realtors—be reasonable about the price. And be flexible. “If you’re going to list your house, it’s going to disrupt your lifestyle pattern for awhile. You’ll need to be willing to show at a moment’s notice, be as agreeable and as flexible as possible, and put a little effort into it. The return will be worth it,” said Sharon Halliburton, broker associate with American Homes of Stevensville. She and other area Realtors say the worst is over. “I’m extremely optimistic. We’ve turned a corner,” Halliburton said.

National picture
After a surge last year from September through November, the original deadline for a $8,000 tax credit, existing home sales nationally fell in December 2009. But prices rose from December 2008 and sales overall improved in 2009, according to the National Association of Realtors.

For all of 2009, there were 5.1 million existing home sales, 4.9% higher than the 4.9 million transactions recorded in 2008, the first annual sales gain since 2005.

On the other hand, in Southwest Michigan, residential sales totaled just over $381.6 million in 2009, down 18% from nearly $465.9 million in 2008. It was the area’s third consecutive year of decline in the real estate market.

The number of single-family homes sold in 2009 was within 1% of the number sold in 2008, but the average selling price, $151,190, was down 18%. The median selling price of $93,550 was down 22% from 2008. Total closed sales, including single-family and multi-family houses, vacant land and commercial property, also dropped 18%, from $516.43 million in 2008 to just over $422.2 million in 2009.

In Southwest Michigan, Walter said prices have been influenced by the percentage of bank-owned homes on the market. He said that between May and November 2009, bank-owned houses accounted for about 35% of the total unit sales. In December that figure climbed to 45%.

Arnt said he’s not quick to steer potential buyers to bank-owned listings. “Most of the banks are willing to negotiate, and that brings down the price. But I typically tell my folks that if somebody couldn’t afford to pay their mortgage, what else haven’t they been able to keep up about the house? There’s more risk. You have to be willing to gamble,” he said.

But Art Atilla, a Realtor working primarily in St. Joseph and Benton Harbor, said there’s a reason the average number of days on the market in Benton Harbor in 2009 was 91, down 11% from 2008 and the quickest turn-around time in Southwest Michigan last year. “There’s a greater number of repossessed homes in Benton Harbor, and those are being sold off quickly because investors can pick them up for $15,000 to $30,000, depending on the location,” he said. “Is it better to have empty houses owned by banks, or have an investor buy it, clean it up and get it going? The best thing would be a for a family to buy it. But these houses need to be bought by somebody.”

Economists say the market is going through swings driven by the tax credit. The extension of the tax credit is expected to spur an increase in sales during the first quarter of 2010, normally the slowest quarter of the year. The extension gives buyers until April 30 to buy and until June 30 to close. The credit, up to $8,000, originally was for first-time buyers only, but has been extended to include homeowners who have lived in their home for five of the last 8 years. These people get up to $6,500. Extension of the tax credit adds more potential buyers to the market.

By early summer, the market should benefit from a more balanced inventory, leading to an overall rise in sales in 2010, economists say.

Jobs, jobs, jobs
But a lot could depend on the job market. Realtors say job creation is the key to a continued recovery in the housing market.

Once the home buyer tax credit ends at the end of April, and if mortgage rates rise after March, will the market be in trouble again? Since most of the fuel to the housing market in 2009 was provided by the government, does the market remain too fragile for the government help to end? Arnt predicts the government will let the tax credit expire, then launch some other incentive down the road. That might be a good thing, he said. “I think they announced too early that they were going to extend it, without letting the original one expire. There were people on the fence who didn’t get off because they heard the credit was going to be extended,” he said.

Arnt is optimistic about the housing market’s future. “Personally, I feel very confident. I think the worst is over. I think we definitely have bottomed out, and things are looking very positive. There’s buyer activity that wasn’t there 30-60 days ago.” Arnt said potential buyers are breathing a sigh of relief, having made it through the holidays with their jobs intact. “I think people are more comfortable and feel that the market has been through the worst and is on the way to recovery,” he said.

Realtors are hoping that a shrinking inventory will help improve the average sales price. The December 2009 inventory dropped 7% from December 2008. In Southwest Michigan, there are 2,803 houses listed, which equates to a 13.3-month supply. That is down from a 16.5-month supply in November 2009 and a 14.1-month supply in December 2009.

National figures for January showed an inventory of 3.29 million existing homes, 11.1% below a year ago and 28.2% below the record of 4.58 million in July 2008. Nationally, the median home price in December 2009 was $178,300, 1.5% higher than in December 2008. Economists said that was due to an increased number of mid- to upper-priced houses in the mix.

Prices stabilizing
Halliburton said, after reviewing the January figures, she’s optimistic. She said that in St. Joseph and Lakeshore, there were 26 homes sold in January, a 73% jump over 15 sold last January.

The average number of days on the market for homes sold in St. Joseph and Lakeshore in January was 99, compared to 147 days a year ago. The average sales price in the same area in January was $153,648, down just $132 from a year ago.

For the entire Southwest Michigan area, she said, the average price was up 27% over a year ago. “I’m excited. These are the best numbers I’ve seen in a long time,” Halliburton said. “I’ve been listing at least one house a week since the first of the year. My spring starts in February, marketing-wise.”

To sell your house, she said, it’s got to look better than everybody else’s on the block. “Work on curb appeal outside. Inside, de-clutter, clean, paint, all the things you’ve been meaning to clean anyway- take a third of the stuff out of every room.”

Atilla recommends “staging” a house before putting it on the market. “You get somebody with a good eye and you can cost-effectively make the home as good as it can be. Paint, rearrange furniture, add color accents, put towels in the bathroom. If you need a new roof or furnace, be honest about that in your price.”

Copyright (c) 2010, The Herald-Palladium, St. Joseph, Mich.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

February 26, 2010

New-Home Sales Fall to Record-Low Level

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 2:14 pm

RISMEDIA, February 26, 2010—(MCT)—Sales of new U.S. homes plunged 11.2% in January 2010 to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 309,000, the lowest rate on record dating back to 1963, the Commerce Department recently reported.

The third-straight drop in sales on a month-to-month basis was unexpected. “The housing market remains very, very distressed,” wrote Dan Greenhaus, chief economist for Miller Tabak & Co.

“There may have been some weather-related issues playing havoc with the sales data but clearly, these results are extremely unnerving,” wrote Jennifer Lee, an economist for BMO Capital Markets. “There is nothing positive to glean from this report.”

U.S. stock markets fell after release of the report, which coincided with release of congressional testimony by Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, who said the economy remains fragile and needs low interest rates for an extended period of time.

Data on sales for December 2009 were revised higher to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 348,000, up from 342,000 previously reported.

Sales of new homes are down 6.1% compared with January 2009’s 329,000 units, which was the previous record low. The number of homes for sale rose 0.4% to 234,000 in January. At the January sales pace, it would take 9.1 months to sell that inventory, up from 8.0 months in December and the highest monthly supply since May.

Government statisticians have low confidence in the monthly report, which is subject to large revisions, and large sampling and other statistical errors. In most months, the government isn’t sure whether sales rose or fell. The standard error in January for instance, was plus or minus 14%. The government says it can take up to five months to establish a statistically significant trend in sales. Over the last five months, sales have been on a 362,000 seasonally adjusted annual pace, down from 382,000 in the five-month interval through December.

Sales had risen fairly steadily in the first half of 2009 before plateauing last fall. Seasonally adjusted sales have now fallen three months in a row.

With mortgage rates still very low and prices down, most analysts had concluded that the recent decline in sales was due to the impending expiration of the first-time home buyers’ credit in November.

As it happened, Congress extended the tax credit through June and expanded it to include repeat buyers. But the tax credit didn’t help sales in January. Sales of new homes are recorded once a sales contract is signed, not at closing. Some homes are sold before ground is broken on construction.

Details
Home builders had been slashing their inventory of unsold homes for more than a year to a 38-year low before January’s 1,000 increase. The number of homes for sale that are under construction fell to a record low of 100,000.

Builders have cut back on production of new homes, but they still face headwinds from unsold existing-homes as foreclosures continue to mount up. If a home isn’t sold before it’s finished, it’s taking a record 14.2 months to sell it after completion—a reflection of the mismatch between more expensively priced homes in the inventory and lower-priced homes that have been selling.

The median sales price of a new home sold in January was $203,500, down 2.4% compared with a year earlier. Cheaper homes were selling better than expensive ones: 47% of sales were for less than $200,000, up from 43% in December. Meanwhile, 38% of sales were for $200,000 to $400,000, down from 41% in December.

Sales were down in three of four regions: down 35% in the Northeast, down 12% in the West and down 10% in the South. January’s sales were up 2% in the Midwest, the government’s data showed.

(c) 2010, MarketWatch.com Inc.

Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

RISMedia welcomes your questions and comments. Send your e-mail to: realestatemagazinefeedback@rismedia.com.

For more top headlines on RISMedia.com, don’t miss:
5 Great Strategies to Keep Your Website in Tip-Top Shape – Part 2
U.S. Home Value Losses Stabilize in 2009; Homeowners Lose Nearly $500 Billion in Value

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101

February 25, 2010

C.A.R. Reports Entry-Level Housing Affordability Remained at 64 Percent in Fourth Quarter 2009

Filed under: Home Buying — admin @ 1:35 pm

RISMEDIA, February 25, 2010—The percentage of households that could afford to buy an entry-level home in California remained at 64% in the fourth quarter of 2009, compared with 61% (revised) for the same period a year ago, according to a report released by the California Association of Realtors® (C.A.R.).

C.A.R.’s First-time Buyer Housing Affordability Index (FTB-HAI) measures the percentage of households that can afford to purchase an entry-level home in California. C.A.R. also reports first-time buyer indexes for regions and select counties within the state. The Index is one of the most fundamental measures of housing well-being for first-time buyers in the state.

The minimum household income needed to purchase an entry-level home at $257,940 in California in the fourth quarter of 2009 was $44,100, based on an adjustable interest rate of 4.5% and assuming a 10% down payment. First-time buyers typically purchase a home equal to 85% of the prevailing median price. The monthly payment including taxes and insurance was $1,470 for the fourth quarter of 2009.

At $44,100, the minimum qualifying income was 4% lower than a year earlier when households needed $45,900 to qualify for a loan on an entry-level home. Home prices remained below peak levels, resulting in an improvement in housing affordability compared with the previous year.

At 84%, the High Desert region was the most affordable area in the state. The San Luis Obispo County region was the least affordable in the state at 48%, followed by the San Francisco Bay region and Santa Barbara area both at 50%.

For more information, visit www.car.org.

Don’t miss these headlines on RISMedia.com:
Top 9 Reverse Mortgage Myths – Separating Fact from Fiction
Murphy’s Law and the Real Estate Agent

View full post on RISMedia » Home Buying 101